On Sun, 2003-09-14 at 02:18, Daniel Stone wrote: > On Sun, Sep 14, 2003 at 02:03:36AM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote: > > On Sun, 2003-09-14 at 01:03, Daniel Stone wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 03:57:12PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 07:58, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote: > > > > > - rename xlibmesa-drm-src to xlibmesa-drm-source, for > > > > > consistency, and > > > > > > > > While you're renaming the package, couldn't you finally remove the bogus > > > > reference to Mesa? > > > > > > What would you suggest? > > > > I've made a number of proposals before, they didn't seem good. > > > > > I was under the impression DRM stuff came from the Mesa dudes. > > > > It doesn't, as I've pointed out a couple of times before. The DRM in > > XFree86 is a copy from the DRI tree. > > It was originally xfree86-drm-source (ds2 era IIRC), but that didn't last > long. > I think people on this list forced a change.
For the worse IMO, any pointers to that discussion though? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer \ Debian (powerpc), XFree86 and DRI developer Software libre enthusiast \ http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer
