Your message dated Wed, 8 Oct 2003 23:02:30 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#18061: Xprt config files are in xprt-common
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Feb 2001 18:21:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 21 12:21:05 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from enhanced.ppp.eticomm.net (intech19.enhanced.com)
[::ffff:206.228.183.5]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14Vdsp-0007I8-00; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 12:20:59 -0600
Received: from camm by intech19.enhanced.com with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 14Vdsj-00079r-00; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 13:20:53 -0500
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xprt: No config files
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.2.10
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 13:20:53 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: xprt
Version: 3.3.6-11potato32
Severity: normal
Here is a minimal set I had to find from somewhere to get basic
printing in openoffice to work:
intech19:~$ ls -lR /tmp/C
/tmp/C:
total 1
drwxrwxrwx 3 root root 1024 Feb 21 13:02 print
/tmp/C/print:
total 3
-rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 1756 Feb 21 13:02 Xprinters
drwxrwxrwx 2 root root 1024 Feb 21 12:52 attributes
/tmp/C/print/attributes:
total 5
-rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 900 Feb 21 12:58 document
-rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 675 Feb 21 12:58 job
-rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 2654 Feb 21 12:58 printer
intech19:~$
Thanks for your work on Debian!
-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Kernel Version: Linux intech19 2.2.17 #1 SMP Fri Dec 29 16:02:56 EST 2000 i686
unknown
Versions of the packages xprt depends on:
ii libc6 2.1.3-15 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and
Timezone data
ii xlib6g 3.3.6-11potato32 shared libraries required by X clients
ii zlib1g 1.1.3-5 compression library - runtime
^^^ (Provides virtual package libz1)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 18061-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Oct 2003 04:02:32 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 08 23:02:31 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dhcp065-026-182-085.indy.rr.com (redwald.deadbeast.net)
[65.26.182.85]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A7S0V-0005IT-00; Wed, 08 Oct 2003 23:02:31 -0500
Received: by redwald.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 7538A6407D; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 23:02:30 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 23:02:30 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#18061: Xprt config files are in xprt-common
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nCRcqX7cEx7rr7Pe"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-No-CC: I subscribe to this list; do not CC me on replies.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.7 required=4.0
tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_05
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_05
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
--nCRcqX7cEx7rr7Pe
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 10:33:07AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> The config files for Xprint are now provided in xprt-common.
>=20
> Note you should use the xprt-xprintorg package instead of xprt, since
> XFree86's Xprt is buggy.
>=20
> I think this bug can be closed.
I agree. The XFree86 implementation of Xprt was incomplete.
Furthermore, xprt now depends on xprt-common, so this bug can be closed
anyway.
--=20
G. Branden Robinson | It doesn't matter what you are
Debian GNU/Linux | doing, emacs is always overkill.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Stephen J. Carpenter
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
--nCRcqX7cEx7rr7Pe
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAj+E3dUACgkQ6kxmHytGonzfgwCfWnHurrg/4VXjAwyRbXf9lfEM
jukAnRUYl60j3/96aSc/Wp0iZHbUPbrD
=NEyI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nCRcqX7cEx7rr7Pe--
