On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 07:12:31AM -0400, John Dalbec wrote: > Package: xserver-common > Version: 4.2.1-12.1 > Severity: wishlist > > Please provide an option to allow xserver-common/dexconf to update only its > section of the XF86Config-4 file the way it used to do. I went to the trouble > of moving my customizations outside the DEBCONF SECTION markers, so why should > I be denied the benefits of doing so? I don't find the original behavior > "too confusing ... to tolerate". I do find it confusing when you suddenly > change the behavior.
I made the decision I did based on a high volume of complaints, and a
consensus on configuration file handling which was reached on the
debian-devel mailing list over the past several months.
Once ucf is documented such that I can actually understand it[1], I will
probably migrate to it.
[1] Last time I tried to learn how to use it, I was put off by the
explicit constraint of its scope to management of Emacs-related
files, and a general style that appeared to presume I knew a lot of
things about how ucf worked.
--
G. Branden Robinson | The best place to hide something is
Debian GNU/Linux | in documentation.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Ethan Benson
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
