-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Felix Schulte wrote: | Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: |
|> Since the xprint-org package is anyway maintained outside the xfree86 |> tree AND considering that the whole purpose of these new X.org packages |> is to split the tree as much as possible, I suggest that we can just |> stop shipping the xprint code from x.org tree, since there is absolutely |> no point in shipping it twice and maintaing it twice. | | Urgh. | The X.org tree and the xprint-org are now coming from the same CVS | repository as annouced on the xprint.mozdev.org front page. However I | assume that both will continue to have different functionality, X.org | version being the normal version, xprint-org being the development | version or something like that. Given what Drew wrote in another mail in this thread there is no point. They come from the same CVS and Drew never uploaded a development snapshot. | Fabio: What about making Drew Parsons the maintainer of both versions | just for the case that you can't handle it? :) That's up to Drew and not to me. | I disagree :) | Both packages should be seperate as both have different functionality | (one example: One of the Xprt servers now has OpenGL support which is a | *BIG* reason for us to drop our current Postscript hacking efforts and | switch completely over to Xprint!) What about our users? Which package are they suppose to use by default? Isn't this option confusing for them? Fabio - -- <user> fajita: step one <fajita> Whatever the problem, step one is always to look in the error log. <user> fajita: step two <fajita> When in danger or in doubt, step two is to scream and shout. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBakcHhCzbekR3nhgRAvo5AKCfNlxAUkf8D4gph8Xrdmo9d9/NkACgpg9z 8hPl71ifSyBi8w2jgeKXZd8= =jUXs -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
