On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 15:13:38 -0500 Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > libxpm4 appears to have a bad 'fgrep' in the postinst. Here's what it's > > > actually running: > > > > This is a duplicate of #233645, apologies for filing it (I didn't notice > > the pending bugs). > > Would it have helped if reportbug listed pending bugs first (or > interleaved with the corresponding severities)? > > I am always trying to think of wishlist bugs for reportbug, so I get > fewer aggravative duplicates. :)
As a matter of fact, it would have - the web interface to the BTS could use the same. (I consulted the latter fully, checking for all grave/critical/serious/important bugs, but failed to see the pending bugs down at the bottem. I didn't look through reportbug's output, having done that, but I'm sure there will be some occasion in the future where I'll see reportbug's output and not consult the web interface.)
