On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 11:49:39AM +0100, Jens Nachtigall wrote: [...] > I totally agree with this point. I, for instance, did not even now that > the 10X in pc10X stands for the number of keys up to now. And how can I > now, if the debconf description is such a bad help. The description by > debconf is definetely too short: > > QUOTE > The "pc104" keyboard is like the pc101 model, with additional keys. > These keys are usually engraved with a "logo" symbol (there is > typically a pair of these, between each set of control and alt keys), > and a "menu" key. > . > The "pc102" and "pc105" models are versions of the pc101 and pc104 > keyboards, respectively, often found in Europe. > /QUOTE
I do not know if you live in Europe or not, but read some French people having similar complaints. Given the quotation above, why they did not select pc102 or pc105 is a mistery to me. FYI this description has been enhanced, unstable now displays: The "pc102" and "pc105" models are versions of the pc101 and pc104 keyboards, respectively, often found in Europe. If your keyboard has a "< >" key (a single key engraved with both the less-than and greater-than symbols), you likely have a "pc102" or "pc105" model; if you choose "pc101" or "pc104" instead, your "< >" key might not work. As I wrote in a separate thread, I believe that default value should now be pc105, but that's another story. Denis
