Your message dated Wed, 31 Mar 2004 15:55:01 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#240788: xserver-xfree86: font config should include font
server at port 7110 (default for xfs-xtt)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Mar 2004 09:31:07 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 29 01:31:07 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mgw-x3.nokia.com [131.228.20.26]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B7t6p-0000Lj-00; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 01:31:07 -0800
Received: from esdks004.ntc.nokia.com (esdks004.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.159])
by mgw-x3.nokia.com (Switch-2.2.8/Switch-2.2.8) with ESMTP id
i2T9UkD25895;
Mon, 29 Mar 2004 12:30:56 +0300 (EET DST)
X-Scanned: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 12:30:39 +0300 Nokia Message Protector V1.3.21
2004031416 - RELEASE
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by esdks004.ntc.nokia.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) id i2T9UdRs031578;
Mon, 29 Mar 2004 12:30:39 +0300
X-pstn-settings: 6(2:2) p:3 r:4 m:4 c:1
X-pstn-version: pase:2.3
X-pstn-levels: s:9.1385 p:95.9108 r:95.9108 m:98.9607 c:78.1961
X-pstn-address: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-pstn-spam: N
received: from mgw-int2.ntc.nokia.com (172.21.143.97)
by esdks004.ntc.nokia.com 00I9zVOt; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 12:27:09 EEST
received: from esebh001.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh001.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.28])
by mgw-int2.ntc.nokia.com (Switch-2.2.8/Switch-2.2.8) with ESMTP id
i2T8axF06888;
Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:36:59 +0300 (EET DST)
received: from [127.0.0.1] ([10.211.4.107]) by esebh001.NOE.Nokia.com with
Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6881);
Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:35:46 +0300
content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
mime-version: 1.0
content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
from: Zoltan Ivanfi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
to: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
subject: xserver-xfree86: font config should include font server at port 7110
(default for xfs-xtt)
x-mailer: reportbug 2.54
date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 10:35:46 +0200
message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
x-originalarrivaltime: 29 Mar 2004 08:35:46.0742 (UTC)
FILETIME=[D4FE1560:01C41568]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.3.0-7
Severity: wishlist
The default Files section should not only include
FontPath "unix/:7100" # local font server
but also
FontPath "unix/:7110" # local xfs-xtt font
server
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 240788-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Mar 2004 20:55:07 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 31 12:55:07 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dhcp065-026-182-085.indy.rr.com (redwald.deadbeast.net)
[65.26.182.85]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B8mjq-0008Jl-00; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 12:55:07 -0800
Received: by redwald.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 65EAC6422B; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 15:55:01 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 15:55:01 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#240788: xserver-xfree86: font config should include font
server at port 7110 (default for xfs-xtt)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="U5J2I87mWnf1KeOw"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-No-CC: I subscribe to this list; do not CC me on replies.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--U5J2I87mWnf1KeOw
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 05:09:17PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You're right.
>=20
> I didn't know xfs-xtt was outmoded and I had a reason in the past to pref=
er
> it. I don't remember what it was, but it seems to be gone: I changed to x=
fs
> and I'm satisfied with it.
>=20
> Thanks and sorry for bothering,
No problem; thanks for following up.
Closing per submitter.
--=20
G. Branden Robinson | My first priority in any attack is
Debian GNU/Linux | to solve the problem - not issue a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | press release.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Steve McInerney
--U5J2I87mWnf1KeOw
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkBrMCUACgkQ6kxmHytGonwf0wCeKVKBcjsT1O4YfECdd9Zi5e+I
JlQAnjPNuIRH3fy5xi8g4FmRzDAZX/v6
=pD/q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--U5J2I87mWnf1KeOw--
