On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 11:52:37PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> 
> I did.
> 
>   From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>   Subject: Re: Bug#248940: xlibs: strange caps lock lag
>   Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 22:59:58 -0500
>   Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Sorry, I should've paid more attention to the headers in the BTS.

BTW, that mail was stuck on your machine until today.

Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10]
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1BUUny-0005QF-00; Sun, 30 May 2004 13:13:07 -0500
Received: from dhcp065-026-182-085.indy.rr.com (redwald.deadbeast.net) 
[65.26.182.85]
        by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1BUUny-0007Jw-00; Sun, 30 May 2004 12:13:06 -0600
Received: by redwald.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 18050649D7; Fri, 28 May 2004 22:59:59 -0500 (EST)

 
> However, I am supremely disinterested in playing your favorite sport
> (bug tennis), so I guess this bug will languish until a kernel
> person can be troubled to look at it, just like the last Toshiba laptop
> keyboard problem you insisted wasn't the kernel's business to deal
> with[1][2].  As you said, "There is no way that this patch can be
> accepted...Don't bother reassigning it back to me because I will simply
> reassign it again with no warning."[3]

I'm no longer the maintainer of the kernel package, so I suggest that
you appeal to the new maintainers directly at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If they're happy with the bug report, then I certainly will not stand
in the way of you reassigning it.

Thanks,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email:  Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt


Reply via email to