Branden Robinson writes: > On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 11:11:35AM +0100, Matthew Vernon wrote: > > Branden Robinson writes: > > > On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 04:23:47AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > > Sorry. I've now attached a version that should work. > > > > > > It's been a few days. Do either of you gentlemen have anything to > > > report? > > > > Yes - I've been away for the weekend :p > > > > > If not, I will have to close this report as being unreproducible, and > > > having a submitter unresponsive to requests for further information. > > > > Given the first script you sent was buggy, I think a little more > > patience might be called for. > > I generally give people 30 days.
I filed the bug on Fri, 05 Mar 2004 [87 days pass] You replied with the first shell script on Tue, 1 Jun 2004 I ran it, and sent you the output on the same day You sent me the second shell script on Wed, 2 Jun 2004 [5 days pass] You then chased that up on Mon, 7 Jun 2004 I think I'm probably entitled to feel rather unnecessarily hassled at this point. As to your suggestion, I'll try that and get back to you - but it's likely to be next week. Matthew -- Rapun.sel - outermost outpost of the Pick Empire http://www.pick.ucam.org
