Author: branden Date: 2004-06-24 11:38:45 -0500 (Thu, 24 Jun 2004) New Revision: 1571
Modified: trunk/debian/CHANGESETS trunk/debian/local/FAQ.xhtml Log: Mark up "freedesktop.org" as a literal since it is a proper noun but should not be capitalized (per Daniel Stone). Modified: trunk/debian/CHANGESETS =================================================================== --- trunk/debian/CHANGESETS 2004-06-24 16:22:23 UTC (rev 1570) +++ trunk/debian/CHANGESETS 2004-06-24 16:38:45 UTC (rev 1571) @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ Add FAQ entries: + What is the story with XFree86 being forked? + What is the story with XFree86's license? - 1562, 1563, 1564, 1565, 1566, 1567, 1568 + 1562, 1563, 1564, 1565, 1566, 1567, 1568, 1571 Update Brazilian Portuguese template translations (thanks, Andre Luis Lopes). (Closes: #255963) Modified: trunk/debian/local/FAQ.xhtml =================================================================== --- trunk/debian/local/FAQ.xhtml 2004-06-24 16:22:23 UTC (rev 1570) +++ trunk/debian/local/FAQ.xhtml 2004-06-24 16:38:45 UTC (rev 1571) @@ -426,8 +426,9 @@ conflicts, and in 2003 a group of developers resolved to set up a separate development project, which was initially christened <code class="other">xwin.org</code>, but later merged with an existing standardization -project, <a href="http://freedesktop.org/";>freedesktop.org</a>. (Another group, -<a href="http://www.xouvert.org";>Xouvert</a>, had also undertaken to fork the +project, <code class="other"><a +href="http://freedesktop.org/";>freedesktop.org</a></code>. (Another group, <a +href="http://www.xouvert.org";>Xouvert</a>, had also undertaken to fork the XFree86 codebase.) While this development was lauded by many redistributors and feature-hungry end users, its short-term practical impact was fairly small. OS distributors stuck with XFree86 because it was "ready" and it worked.
