Your message dated Wed, 1 Sep 2004 21:45:44 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line xlibs: [XKB] us symbols file has Multi_key but not Meta_R
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Nov 2000 05:19:55 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 03 23:19:54 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pm3naxs12-218.naxs.com (london.progenylinux.com)
[::ffff:216.98.81.218]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 13rvkA-0005pO-00; Fri, 03 Nov 2000 23:19:54 -0600
Received: from andromeda.indy.progenylinux.com (andromeda [64.64.82.228])
by london.progenylinux.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id C215723D2C; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 00:19:52 -0500 (EST)
Received: from liddy.indy.progeny.com (liddy.indy.progeny.com [64.64.82.249])
by andromeda.indy.progenylinux.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id A55A71BF71; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 00:19:51 -0500 (EST)
Received: by liddy.indy.progeny.com (Postfix, from userid 10010)
id 9D4E57657; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 00:19:49 -0500 (EST)
From: Eric Gillespie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Default US XKB has Meta_L but no Meta_R (patch included)
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.3
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.3
Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2000 00:19:48 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: xlibs
Version: 4.0.1-0phase2v29
Severity: wishlist
Here is a small patch that fixes what is in my opinion a
deficiency in the default bindings (not to mention it screwed up
my ~/.Xmodmap :).
***BEGIN***
--- etc/X11/xkb/symbols/us.orig Wed Nov 1 23:12:37 2000
+++ etc/X11/xkb/symbols/us Wed Nov 1 23:09:37 2000
@@ -223,7 +223,7 @@
key <LALT> { [ Alt_L ] };
key <RALT> { [ Alt_R ] };
key <LWIN> { [ Meta_L ] };
- key <RWIN> { [ Multi_key ] };
+ key <RWIN> { [ Meta_R ] };
key <MENU> { [ Menu ] };
// modifier mappings
***END***
-- System Information
Debian Release: progeny
Architecture: i386
8517: Segmentation fault
Kernel: Linux liddy 2.2.18pre15 #1 Thu Nov 2 18:29:12 EST 2000 i686
Versions of packages xlibs depends on:
pi libc6 2.1.94-3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii xfree86-common 4.0.1-0phase2v29 X Window System (XFree86) infrastr
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 76220-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Sep 2004 19:42:46 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 01 12:42:46 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from postfix3-2.free.fr [213.228.0.169]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C2b0I-0004qc-00; Wed, 01 Sep 2004 12:42:46 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [82.254.62.138])
by postfix3-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3E20C6E0
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 1 Sep 2004 23:38:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 6DAB723DC0; Wed, 1 Sep 2004 21:45:44 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 21:45:44 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: xlibs: [XKB] us symbols file has Multi_key but not Meta_R
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040818i
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Denis Barbier)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
This change s/Meta_R/Multi_key/ was introduced upstream in
/etc/X11/xkb/symbols/us CVS 3.9 (2000/10/27) and reverted in
CVS 3.11 (2001/08/17). So it has also been fixed in Debian
for a long time, and I am closing this bug now.
Thanks for your report.
Denis
