Hello, Mike. I have read all the (in)famous bug Redhat#161242, regarding libvgahw.a. It seems that you rolled out a -43 release that intends to fix this problem. As far as I can tell, gcc developers have not agreed about the path for fixing this issue.
My question is: what have you done for #161242 in that latest release?
Maybe
apply the patch that Olivier Baudron posted in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=161242#c63, or simply
compile without optimization libvgahw.a, or a third solution?
Given that you seem to be responsible for this last release, I prefer
to ask
you, and avoid reading all the patches in -43 if possible. ;-)
Thank you in advance,
Ender.
--
Why is a cow? Mu. (Ommmmmmmmmm)
--
Debian developer
pgp63FDvyWyF9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
