On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 12:18:39AM +0800, Eugene Konev wrote: > > Hello David. > > On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 12:00:18 -0400 > you wrote: > > > > 5+SVN > 5. That should be 4+SVN, probably. > > > Nope, sadly -4 is in the archive already since I messed up a couple of > > things in -3. -4 is in good shape so far though, so it may be able to > > go in > > to testing. While I'm tempted to get -5 with your SELinux fix in > > first, I > > think unblocking things like gnome from migrating to testing is > > probably > > more important. > > The problem is: if you build and install packages from current svn, > you won't be able to upgrade them once -5 is out as -5+SVN > -5.
Good point. To be honest, I don't fully understand Branden's numbering scheme. Let's go with -4+SVN then, and we'll also borrow a page from the debian-installer team, who uses UNRELEASED (rather than unstable/experimental/etc) until the package is actually built for upload. - David Nusinow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
