On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 05:25:49PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote: > On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 22:57 -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin > wrote: > > Log: > > * We no longer build or ship xlibs-dev > > \o/
I thought you'd like that ;-) > Can we please do the same to xlibs-static-dev? > > libXfont and libfontcache don't need to be shipped, neither does > libxf86config. The rest should be made shared as well as static. I discussed something similar for xlibs-static-dev with the release team. I was planning on splitting the static libs in to their own packages, but keep them as static libs. xlibs-static-dev would hang around for a little while longer as a metapackage depending on them. I'm not sure if I'd kill that metapackage before etch, since it's got a lot fewer dependencies than xlibs-dev. Why haven't the current static libs not been made shared in the past? Still undergoing changes too fast? I also have no idea how to transition a static lib to a shlib, so I'm going to have to do some libtool reading if that's going to happen. - David Nusinow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
