El jueves, 29 de septiembre de 2005 23:18, David Nusinow escribió: > > For this reason I suggest splitting this package into: xutils-dev and > > xutils-misc where the later does not depend on compilers and such. > > Hrm... I was planning on looking at splitting this package for the modular > series anyway, but this makes me want to go for it in 6.9. Any thoughts > from the rest of the X team?
Well, I think someone has told us previously these kind of things. I am
all
for this change, as I hate having 'useless' dependencies. Who is the culprit
of ccp dependency? Imake, if I am right. Maybe even split imake from xutils,
keeping xutils and imake packages insteas of xutils-misc and xutils-dev.
What do you think?
Ender.
--
En la noche de tu sangre los glóbulos son estrellas, cometas los hematíes y
planetas los átomos de hierro.
-- La palmera transparente (Mario Satz)
--
Debian developer
pgp4YLh284v9m.pgp
Description: PGP signature
