Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2005 14:36:15 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#338605: The package xlibmesa3-gl must be real, virtual or
be deleted???
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Nov 2005 13:23:42 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 11 05:23:42 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.206])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EaYsY-0004mB-2o
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 05:23:42 -0800
Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i28so626142nzi
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 05:23:41 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition;
b=KU4I6aUQLS1/jvBt0S//7yjylIXEDhEwmRzZ/JBqcVCyHn2rd4aZId3EUxYiComn3MbmXtn4DY7jLNDhb/dSaR8AizrHWkkMM7zupq8Qve+YgxLgQUvICJP1bcybTPU8Zbw8aTq3favRyCTWMbDWG4+PlQXdE9nrsGm/j7Fh6Aw=
Received: by 10.36.157.2 with SMTP id f2mr1306344nze;
Fri, 11 Nov 2005 05:23:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.36.154.16 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 05:23:41 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 14:23:41 +0100
From: ventreska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The package xlibmesa3-gl must be real, virtual or be deleted???
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: xlibmesa3-gl
Version:
Hi
Only a question.
This package makes me headaches. I'm coding a program that asks the
packages database, and works ok with all available packages but this.
Is correct its state? The same with xlibmesa3-glu
I'm using Sarge.
Thank you for your job.
Ven from Spain
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 338605-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Nov 2005 13:36:08 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 14 05:36:08 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from darkcity.gna.ch ([195.226.6.9])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EbeVE-00062Z-6u
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 05:36:08 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by darkcity.gna.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F6BE13A2A3;
Mon, 14 Nov 2005 14:36:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: from unknown by localhost (amavisd-new, unix socket)
id client-XXlokCFb; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 14:36:04 +0100 (CET)
Received: by darkcity.gna.ch (Postfix, from userid 65534)
id D234F13A2A2; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 14:36:04 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (84-73-0-242.dclient.hispeed.ch [84.73.0.242])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by darkcity.gna.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9DA613A29F;
Mon, 14 Nov 2005 14:36:03 +0100 (CET)
Received: from daenzer by localhost with local (Exim 4.54)
id 1EbeVM-0007Ua-SQ; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 14:36:16 +0100
Subject: Re: Bug#338605: The package xlibmesa3-gl must be real, virtual or
be deleted???
From: Michel =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E4nzer?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: ventreska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Organization: Debian
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 14:36:15 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gna.ch
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 14:23 +0100, ventreska wrote:
>=20
> Only a question.
A bug report is not an appropriate way to ask a question. In the future,
please ask on a mailing list or another appropriate forum instead.
> This package makes me headaches. I'm coding a program that asks the
> packages database, and works ok with all available packages but this.
> Is correct its state? The same with xlibmesa3-glu
>=20
> I'm using Sarge.
xlibmesa3-gl hasn't been a real package since woody IIRC. You can
basically ignore it in favour of xlibmesa-gl.
Closing this spurious report.
--=20
Earthling Michel D=C3=A4nzer | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI develop=
er
Libre software enthusiast | http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=3Ddaenzer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
