On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 11:43:27PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 04:53:56PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote: > > Right, but it might be a sufficient hint so that aptitude, and maybe apt, > > will do the right thing. > > This change *will* be sufficient to allow aptitude and apt to do the right > thing *in a greater number of cases*. Just how large a coverage this will > give, I can't say -- the only good way to find out is to try it and see what > upgrade testers have to say about it. > > > Ok... I'll lower the priority of the note to medium and add the > > xserver-xfree86 dummy package. Hopefully that'll be sufficient. As > > discussed elsewhere, I'd prefer to use NEWS.Debian, but it won't be shown > > to the user in this case, so a medium priority debconf abusing note should > > suffice. > > What do you mean, "in this case"? I don't see why NEWS.Debian is any less > appropriate here than in other cases. Is there some concern about > apt-listchanges not listing NEWS files for newly-installed packages? > > -- > Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS > Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
