On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 02:13:33PM -0400, Daniel Stone wrote: > On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 07:58:37PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 19:41 +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote: > > > yeah, of course this is why the dependency is there :) > > > But what if xserver-xorg-core already depends on input drivers? > > > > That's the other direction, but FWIW, IIRC there was half a consensus to > > move these dependencies from xserver-xorg-core to xserver-xorg to break > > the dependency cycle. > > Right, which is the only approach that's even vaguely sane. The only > relationships -core should have are versioned Conflicts, if it breaks > the ABI and you really care that much.
Right, this is what it should be. If it's not, it's a fuckup on my part obviously. - David Nusinow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
