On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 02:44:20PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Mon, Oct 9, 2006 at 13:58:22 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > [Please Cc me on replies, I'm not subscribed] > > > > Hi, > > > > what is the plan to continue with this package? AFAICS, there are two > > options: > > > > 1. The maintainers are happy enough with this code, and think that it > > qualifies the DFSG. In this case, the bug report should be > > closed/downgraded. > > 2. We move xserver-xorg-video-nv to non-free, and xserver-xorg-video-all > > to contrib (the source for a contrib package can still be in main). > > > 3. move -video-nv to non-free, and remove the dependency from -video-all > (maybe add a Suggests instead). This looks to me like the most > practical way to give users an upgrade path from the monolith (for users > of non-nvidia hardware, at least). If this is chosen, something should > probably be added to the release notes to warn nv users.
Yes, if we were to move -nv to non-free this would be my choice as well. - David Nusinow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
