Ender wrote: > El miércoles, 11 de octubre de 2006 06:45, Drew Parsons escribió: > > Ah I see. Because the upstream module was renamed "xf86-video-intel", I > > had assumed they were renaming the new driver "intel". But looking > > inside the modesetting branch I see the driver is still called "i810". > > So you're right, xserver-xorg-video-i810-modesetting makes more sense > > in that case, until upstream fully renames it. Unless I missed > > something, this means i810-modesetting will have to conflict with (and > > replace) i810, since it generates the same i810_drv.so (rather than > > intel_drv.so which is what I had assumed it was doing). A pity, since > > this makes it a little harder to test and compare the two side by side. > > You could probably mess a little with the autoconf files and generate a > i810-modesetting_drv.so...
Yeah, that could work. If I'm the one who gets on to it first, I'll probably first package it as-is, using the conflicts. Then once that goes fine we can see if the autoconf tweaking will work easily or not. Drew
