David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's a tough choice. The ease of use of stgit sounds really nice to me, but
> I also love the transparency that having the patches in a location like
> debian/patches affords us. I'm not horribly worried about that though, but
> it is a real benefit. We can get around that by artificially exporting all
> the patches to debian/patches. It's more work, although I'd be happy to
> write a simple script to do this. My feeling is that this would be the best
> of both worlds. What do you guys think?
I personally loves stgit and we're using it here on the company to
follow projects that use other patch systems like svn or when we're
developing a not yet ready for merging change. It does great.
The only problem that I found on stgit is the difficult to push its
full meta-data for the git repository. The only way I've found is to
use rsync. Comments on that?
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
