On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 11:01:13PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote: > * David Nusinow wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 07:18:06AM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote: > > > * David Nusinow wrote: > > > > New branch 'upstream-experimental' available with the following commits: > > > > > > I track the upstream repository directly in upstream-unstable > > > (refs/tags/compiz-0.3.6 from the upstream repository). Do you think it's > > > necessary to have all the autoconf stuff in the upstream-experimental > > > branch? > > > It seems to me to make merging much more difficult, since I'll pretty much > > > only be merging debian into upstream branches and not vice-versa. > > > > How do you do prepare uploads that need to go to unstable when you've also > > got a newer version in experimental? > > You're right, upstream-experimental and debian-experimental should be there, > I just "hadn't gotten there yet" =). > > I was just commenting about the autoconf stuff in the upstream branches. I'd > like to stick with keeping upstream branches identical to upstream release > tags.
That works fine for me. It's the way I originally wrote the policy for all the repos :-) > > You're right about the autoconf stuff in the upstream-* branches, that > > shouldn't be there. But I think it's useful to have the upstream version > > that'll be uploaded to experimental in upstream-experimental. Do you want > > me to remove the autogenerated autoconf stuff from the upstream-* > > branch(es)? > > No need, I'll take care of it when I upgrade to the next upstream release. Cool, thank you. - David Nusinow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
