Julien clarified: > On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 23:53:56 +1100, Drew Parsons wrote: > > > > > > hurd-i386 only exists in unstable, so unless there is an important fix > > > affecting release architectures we want to get into etch in the next > > > weeks, I don't think it's a good use of the release team's time to > > > review this. > > > > True, it's just that the window is currently now open for letting -4 in > > (3 more days to go now). As I understand it the block is currently > > lifted so that -5 could slip in automatically without using up the > > release team's time (with the Hurd update already implicitly accepted > > in -4. -5 simply does what we said -4 would do). > > > The unblock hint is version-specific, so a RM/RA would still have to > debdiff -5 against -4, and update the hints file, for something that > doesn't affect etch :)
Ah OK, I thought they simply unblocked the package, not the specific version. Hurd will just have to make do, then :) Drew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
