But if I want to do a complete Xorg 7.3 backport.. is there any compilation order in addition to what we said....?
2007/4/10, emisca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Thanks, I'll try to build it, and I'll report if it works... 2007/4/10, Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 00:20:53 +0200, emisca wrote: > > > I would like to backport using pbuilder the new 2.0rc intel driver > > that it's present in the experimental branch of debian. > > For what distribution are you trying to backport it? Assuming you mean > etch for now... > > > Could anyone explain me which is the correct chain of dependencies to > > have a well compiled xorg 1.2.99 server + mesa 6.5.2 + > > xserver-xorg-video-intel 1.9.94? > > > > I think it should be, please correct me if I'm wrong: > > - libdrm 2.3 > > - mesa 6.5.2 > > - xorg-core 1.2.99 > > - xserver-xorg-video-intel 1.9.94 > > > You need x11proto-randr and x11proto-damage somewhere before the server. > > > Is there any way to compile it against etch's xorg 7.1? > > > I'm not sure. The needed files from the server sources are present in > the xf86-video-intel tarballs, so it might just work. It's probably not > very well tested though, so if you run into problems you might want to > report them on [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > If I want to have the new randr 1.2 support, what libs are needed > > (perhaps in addition to libxrandr)? > > > libXrandr is only needed for the xrandr command-line client (included in > xbase-clients in Debian), IIRC. > > > Is there a list of the correct building order of the complete new > > modular xorg present in experimental? I've seen that there are many > > libs, and it's very difficult to manually build a dependency list.. > > > Not that I know of. Most of the libs didn't have any big changes > though, so libdrm+mesa+libXrandr might be sufficient. > > Cheers, > Julien >
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
