On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 12:21 +0200, Olaf Till wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 09:53:35PM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote: > > Olaf Till wrote: > > > > With xserver-xorg-core_1.2.99.905-2_i386.deb (ignoring dependencies > > > except libc6) X behaved correctly without drm, but did not even come > > > up with drm, there was no process X afterwards. Installing > > > xserver-xorg-core-dbg_1.2.99.905-2_i386.deb worked. > > > > > > > This is strange too. Installing the -dbg package should not change > > anything regarding "does it start successfully or not?". It only > > provides some debugging symbols for gdb. > > Sorry, a typo, and further misread to 'dbg', probably. I meant without > or with the line 'dri' in the module-section of xorg.conf (not > 'drm'). BTW there was an unsatisfied dependency of the experimental > X-server of a newer libdrm2 (don't know it, but sounds as if it had > something to do with direct rendering) than installed. > > > > I again attach the xorg.conf used for all this and the log of the > > > experimental X-server with dri. > > > > > > > The log is pretty small and doesn't show any problem. Is this the right one? > > I think the log stops after loading the module dri. Seemingly X was > not able to log anything else after this. Compare to the attached > respective log (also experimental server) after commenting out "dri" > in the module-section of xorg.conf. As I said, there was no process X > present after trying to start this experimental server with "dri".
It probably dies trying to call an unresolved function due to the unsatisfied libdrm2 dependency. See the X server's stderr output. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://tungstengraphics.com Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer
