Seg, 2007-04-23 às 21:45 +0200, Brice Goglin escreveu: > Daniel Ruoso wrote: > > 1) I couldn't make the X server work with two different screens (I > > mean :0.0 and :0.1), I only get a xinerama-like support, which is not > > what I want (I like to have 2 x more desktops of the same size and not > > having 2 x bigger the same number of desktops). > I am not sure people are working on what you want nowadays. It looks > like XRandR 1.2 (i.e. improved Xinerama) will rule the world. However, > XRandR may provides almost what you want if the window manager does his > job, I mean the WM could be able to emulate 2x more desktops inside same > number of "2 x bigger" desktop.
Ouch... I think this is a must for lenny, I mean, we must guarantee that every single window manager (ok, at least gnome and kde wm) is able to do that... > > 2) It seems that this also disabled gl support, I used to have direct > > rendering, but I don't have it anymore. > What board do you have? I see "Virtual 2560 1024" in your config, but > only i965 can do DRI on more than 2048x2048 currently (the hardware is > limited to 11bits for each direction). So you might want to change to > "2048 2048" and place one screen above the other one. Hmm... got it... Is there some hack to avoid having to wall-mount the other monitor in top of my laptop in other to get a sane mouse behaviour? > > I'm attaching my config file, but I really don't think there's also > > really specific, in fact, it seems to be ignoring my declaration of two > > screens. > I guess that's expected. xrandr --output VGA --left-of LVDS is the way > to do it now. Having two Monitor/Screen is probably ignores (assuming it > doesn't even crash right now...). I don't know if having two > ServerLayout sections is supposed to do something. The two servers were just because I had a fallback config that I turned on from time to time... daniel
