On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 01:22:02AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Thu, Aug 2, 2007 at 00:43:49 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I successfully built xorg-server 2:1.3.99.0-1, and.. it seems to run > > fine (well, ok, I write that, and five minutes later it dies with > > SIGSEGV). > > AFAICS, what's needed for an upload to experimental is: > > - an updated mesa package, mesa_7_0_branch has everything needed thanks > > to Michel (but see below) > > - pixman out of NEW > > This has now happened (yay).
\o/ Finally! > > - a new xorg package with updated driver ABI versions > > - rebuilt drivers > > I've pushed my current xserver tree to the debian-server1.4 branch at > http://git.debian.org/?p=users/jcristau/xorg-server.git and packages at > http://users.alioth.debian.org/~jcristau/debian/ > In the next days I'll try to build a bunch of drivers and the xorg > package. I don't know if we'll want to use experimental for this now, > or if it'd be better to use a repo on pkg-xorg.alioth.debian.org and > advertise that on blogs and stuff to get some testing? Using > experimental means packages get built on a few architectures, but it > means we can't use it for driver updates like ati 6.6.193. What do you > think? Rock. I like the idea of using pkg-xorg instead of people.debian.org (which I did in the past) a lot. Let me know when you get the repo set up and I'll blog about it. All the drivers are built from the stuff that's in git, right? Except for -ati, that's all in the -unstable branches, iirc. I'm going to start a frenzy of patching the drivers today so that they can be autoloaded, and I want to be sure I'm committing to the right branches for what you're building. - David Nusinow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
