hey emilio, On Sunday 16 December 2007 06:22:57 pm emisca wrote: > Do you have considered inclusion of the compiz-manager > (http://releases.compiz-fusion.org/0.6.0/compiz-manager-0.6.0.tar.gz) > in the compiz package, or as a new separate package?
i guess we were thinking the same thing... because about 1 minute before you
sent this email i had uploaded a new compiz package which, among other
things, include compiz-manager as a replacement for the previous
compiz.wrapper :)
This closes a *lot* of the open bugs against compiz, which were the result of
the old wrapper doing things like always loading the gconf plugin instead of
the ccp plugin (which breaks a lot of things), and always executing the gtk
decorator (which breaks even more). you should see some traffic on this list
shortly about the closed bugs, i imagine...
about compiz-manager: it's hosted in a seperate git repository on the
compiz-fusion site, but since it's a single shell script i don't really see
much argument for hosting it as a seperate source package (i think there are
too many already, to be honest). i'll just make sure there's something in
place to keep it in sync with upstream.
thanks for chiming in with your opinion on the matter, it's good to know i
wasn't the only one thinking that!
sean
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
