Hi Sean, here is what I think about compiz packages reorganization: Pros: - small number of packages - single uploads and queues
Cons: - versioning not aligned to upstream, they often release modifications to each of these packages in a separate way. - compiz-fusion-plugins: those plugins are classified by upstream support. It would be a pain for us, supporting the "unsupported" or "extra" plugins without the upstream support... - technical issues: it's more difficult to create a packages from more than one source tree. - fusion icon, ccsm, simple-ccsm are from different upstream teams... Perhaps there is the need of metapackages to ease the installation process to final users. Emilio 2008/2/9, sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > hello debian-x peeps, > > i'm once again finding myself with some time to spend/kill on playing with > compiz foo in debian. > > I've summarized the next steps that i'd like to do here: > > http://wiki.debian.org/XStrikeForce/Compiz#head-26e1b15f16e4dcc647c6eb4e5752cad60c4a9ae1 > > questions/comments/feedback/etc welcome. > > (please cc me in responses, i'm not on the list) > > sean > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
