On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 09:11:05AM +0100, Brice Goglin wrote: > David Nusinow wrote: > > It looks like we still need an -ati backport, although I really don't know > > what the best route to take for this. That driver has undergone so many > > changes, I'm not sure what we can realistically backport. > > > > Agreed. I think ati 6.6.3 was considered a good release. From what I saw > in the BTS, 6.6.19x didn't improve many things and even broke some. Most > new board support was only added very recently in 6.7.19x, but radeonhd > already take care of most of them. > > It's probably worth backporting 0c26806245381b925b73ff9f3b747e3dcf0ebd6f > (old rv380 pci id added recently) and I can have a look at the git > history to find some trivial fixes if needed. > > Michel Danzer's opinion will probably be helpful anyway.
For what it's worth, this was my sense as well. I'm eager to hear from Michel though. - David Nusinow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
