-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On Thu, 2019-01-03 at 09:54 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > I'll try to reach out to Peter but light-locker looks a bit unmaintained. It's > too late for Buster but it might be worth having options for Bullseye (if we > can have some kind of long-term commitment that xfce4-screensaver will be > maintained).
I think I managed to fix the underlying issue, but the current state of the code is a bit scary. I've looked at it for a day and poked here and there to fix deprecations, but that's a lot of duplicate work since the code is actually from gnome-screensaver, mate-screensaver and xfce4-screensaver. It seems that the work has already been done for xfce4-screensaver (it'd be nice if it could be submitted to mate/gnome teams too btw). In an attempt at having a bit more future-proofs options for Bullseye, we can try importing it to the xfce-team umbrella. Could you move/copy you repository on salsa to https://salsa.debian.org/xfce-extras-team/xfce4-screensaver (I'm not sure if you have permissions but please ask if needed). In xfce-team repositories we use git-buildpackage with pristine-tar, could you configure it as well? What's the current way to build the package? Also is it possible to just *not* support the various xscreensavers stuff at all and just lock? Regards, - -- Yves-Alexis -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE8vi34Qgfo83x35gF3rYcyPpXRFsFAlwuNXIACgkQ3rYcyPpX RFtfCggArN05WTFYXOaeM74mf6xlu29LHlFNW14VD6WM49w19y2km7u1U6rUXf2q abj4D8vaJEJTn1cCAQo+h4pxLscfamWTB7igycEG0NnqkngHIIbgm6NMsByxzIsK KuNRFvzUfc7jMEK4oLTUiEQD6bErU0M6UM1rclp7Bj9w6wT5BVCms9rm3PVkcmxY HjThsvYTni/zKsqFWiGqQjtxKnGJrBGPLLMwrYsgMsgDImGXpzAIlLJGyRZUiSpj EDyniFRqwxGi6di/BWtZ4tZKeKmwaghPp9jnckMdvQl63QmJdK9Nq25XjwmFVvzL fJ8nlpRz8FgZBWfR1I2W6pwvE8ZMqA== =tWTV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
