-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On Tue, 2019-02-19 at 21:54 +0100, Dominik George wrote: > Control: retitle -1 screen locking does not work without lightdm > Control: severity -1 important > > > In xflock4, please support xfce4-screensaver, which is a mate-screensaver > > fork targeted at Xfce4 integration. > > > > If installed, it should get the same priority as mate-screensaver > > (probably > > one higher).
I've prepared a local patch to xfce4-session 4.13 (targeted at experimental). > > If possible, please also recommend xfce4-screensaver in xfce4-session. > This ensures screen locking works out of the box in environments without > lightdm running, e.g. under X2go or RDP, in an LTSP environment using > LDM, and probably quite a few others. > > A patch is attached. NACK for now. First, xfce4-screensaver was never intended for Buster, second I'm not sure at all I want to actually replace lightdm/light-locker by xfce4- screensaver. > > I would very much suggest to upload this as a Debian patch before buster > full freeze, even though it should of course be fixed upstream. I > personally know about some hundred desktops that do not (aand cannot) > use lightdm (see above), so this breaks quite an important use case if > not fixed. Again, no, this will be decided for Bullseye. Regards, - -- Yves-Alexis -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE8vi34Qgfo83x35gF3rYcyPpXRFsFAlxum/QACgkQ3rYcyPpX RFvfJwgArE7Bc+eFKByJpn69W1BaIfSMmllmPN/iBInoeNlSRYpUt9sVbLiFbqen QHHALSU3ljtHdBRlNXPT9YbHhoaPQIlL3DFfRcgPJEzTNwA4JUT/9ZgIp6QQjzuB vdPGAV0k9fntPtlsbjAX0w0rojVVaX2A0odDZ/bemHU5lryugJN9vG7Ei0SNwdzN XtU3NoJlOKcmaJPh1M/yQFjJq9e8ymIhxfHtj/XwCVWMY6HdYEk18gHxTv70/reo +yW9Zi4neXoUJ2In2y0XE9yGrbMj0CO6E25Z7qLYxgQUDleJC+8uRrGQ3Urj967T ZtMIciXd2wV4+d/CVQNQDifS0q2Vrw== =GYIA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
