Your message dated Sun, 25 Jan 2026 21:48:56 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#693937: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#693937: Bug#693937: 
Bug#693937: Bug#693937: Bug#693937: Acknowledgement (thunar: Thunar crashes 
when mounting USB stick)
has caused the Debian Bug report #693937,
regarding thunar: Thunar crashes when mounting USB stick
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
693937: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=693937
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: thunar
Version: 1.2.3-4+b1
Severity: important

Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***

   When I try to mount USB stick in Thunar, it crashes.
   I have tried to reinstall Thunar, but it crashes again.
   It happens every time I try to mount USB stick.

   When started in Terminal, it shows this error:

(thunar:23146): GLib-GIO-CRITICAL **: g_mount_get_root: assertion `G_IS_MOUNT
(mount)' failed

(thunar:23146): GLib-GIO-CRITICAL **: g_file_hash: assertion `G_IS_FILE (file)'
failed

(thunar:23146): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT
(object)' failed

(thunar:23146): GLib-GIO-CRITICAL **: g_file_query_info: assertion `G_IS_FILE
(file)' failed

(thunar:23146): GLib-GIO-CRITICAL **: g_file_info_get_file_type: assertion
`G_IS_FILE_INFO (info)' failed

(thunar:23146): GLib-GIO-CRITICAL **: g_file_get_basename: assertion `G_IS_FILE
(file)' failed

(thunar:23146): GLib-GIO-CRITICAL **: g_file_has_prefix: assertion `G_IS_FILE
(file)' failed

(thunar:23146): GLib-GIO-CRITICAL **: g_file_is_native: assertion `G_IS_FILE
(file)' failed

(thunar:23146): GLib-GIO-CRITICAL **: g_file_get_uri: assertion `G_IS_FILE
(file)' failed
Segmentation fault

Version of Thunar is 1.2.3-4+b1.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages thunar depends on:
ii  desktop-file-utils  0.20-0.1
ii  exo-utils           0.6.2-5
ii  libatk1.0-0         2.4.0-2
ii  libc6               2.13-37
ii  libcairo2           1.12.2-2
ii  libdbus-1-3         1.6.8-1
ii  libdbus-glib-1-2    0.100-1
ii  libexo-1-0          0.6.2-5
ii  libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0  2.26.1-1
ii  libglib2.0-0        2.33.12+really2.32.4-3
ii  libgtk2.0-0         2.24.10-2
ii  libgudev-1.0-0      175-7.1
ii  libice6             2:1.0.8-2
ii  libnotify4          0.7.5-1
ii  libpango1.0-0       1.30.0-1
ii  libsm6              2:1.2.1-2
ii  libthunarx-2-0      1.2.3-4+b1
ii  libxfce4ui-1-0      4.8.1-1
ii  libxfce4util4       4.8.2-1
ii  shared-mime-info    1.0-1+b1
ii  thunar-data         1.2.3-4

Versions of packages thunar recommends:
ii  dbus-x11        1.6.8-1
ii  gvfs            1.12.3-1+b1
ii  libfontconfig1  2.9.0-7
ii  libfreetype6    2.4.9-1
ii  thunar-volman   0.6.1-1
ii  tumbler         0.1.25-1+b1
ii  xdg-user-dirs   0.14-1
ii  xfce4-panel     4.8.6-4

Versions of packages thunar suggests:
ii  thunar-archive-plugin     0.3.0-4
ii  thunar-media-tags-plugin  0.2.0-1

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On Thu, 2022-11-03 at 14:30 +0500, Akbarkhon Variskhanov wrote:
> I'm not really sure why, though. Perhaps thunar_file_load() did not
> set everything up properly? In any case, this function was simplified
> ages ago so the bug was most likely also fixed along the way. Version
> 1.5.0 would be my candidate. Do you agree on closing the bug with this
> version?

After quite a while: yes indeed, doing that now...
- -- 
Yves-Alexis
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE8vi34Qgfo83x35gF3rYcyPpXRFsFAml2gbkACgkQ3rYcyPpX
RFsI3ggA4BfbS/rPpAkOQRcegHcyXh6rLMuPVsDxj+c3u9ZAClCKeCWpo8jJ5s82
N2Ji0fjtSou/q4jfauzVd8OcMLWnD4Q/PsX2e4+hynpM/TjcIVGmnS/X7GQOzSWn
kn/U8XgNvYiVfcZO+jR6tBhyFDR8HEU7hG5fQCmRRNVZbJSIhfUWILuCUhWrXdVk
tIXR3MqxA6zeOg3m1E4v6CWifgDQdeishIU8hO2HD0LlC8Ujgahggj7fHpUcmF2H
lctR2czYLFusRHi1YmiVoT52ICEd7ugeD5ObGHOSmqfoToXoe+P4TxJLWYXs11VW
j/wkeK09Y7EPE8C+Ytl8kefU1iiB2w==
=9VEx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to