Erich Schubert wrote: >> 1) define "suite" (this is where we started) > > Why? ;-)
To reduce the amount of effort wasted on arguing individual cases. Though of course that's a false economy if instead we end up spending the same amount of effort on meta-arguments... >> 2) the cut-off point should be higher. > > Why? An UI can still ignore stuff with less than 10 packages if it wants to! The problem with overpopulated facets is that they make it harder for users to find suite::gnome in amongst the small-fry, and harder to get all the appropriate packages tagged. > Abiword is currently only one application (with some variants and plugins) Ah, okay. Forget abiword, then. But how about: suite::adduser suite::alsa and/or ::alsaplayer suite::amarok suite::aolserver suite::apt suite::asterisk (this one's familiar) suite::atlas suite::auto(make, etc) suite::axiom If there are this many candidates for the rest of the alphabet, we're looking at an awful lot of potential suite:: tags. A cut-off of two dozen or so keeps things more manageable. -- JBR Ankh kak! (Ancient Egyptian blessing) _______________________________________________ Debtags-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debtags-devel
