On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 07:36:16PM +0100, Peter Rockai wrote: > name, which makes it a bit impractical. However, something like > [af-svn] [af-dev] [dt-svn] [dt-dev] [dt-voc] > or a variation thereof *could* work... Currently, we get svn mail for > libapt-front to -devel, which is a bit suboptimal in this case, > too. Anyhow, for starters, [af-dev] and [dt-dev] would IMO be good > enough, with additional [svn] for commits in the af case. Also, there
I have no problems in shortening the libapt-front tags. Ask me at any time. > was some sort of trick like subscribing one mailinglist to another, > like debtags-devel subscribed to debtags-vocabulary. Well, just random > thoughts :). Interesting. I still don't think we need it (and then we'd have two archives to search instead of one), but interesting. > PS: Maybe we should add faceted system to the mailing lists and all > posts should be tagged appropriately </joking>. You have no idea how I'd love it. Actually the facets could be added by procmail; it's implementing faceted mailbox storage and patching mutt to use it that would be utterly crazy :( Too bad, because I've been dreaming of tags to sort out mail since a couple of years at least... Ciao, Enrico -- GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Debtags-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debtags-devel
