On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 19:32 +0200, Benjamin Mesing wrote: > > Justin B Rye wrote: > > How about changing the debtags "suite::" facet to "project::" - it > > works neatly for project::gnome, ::debian-med, etc. > I think the potential for misunderstanding is quite low, and not > critical. Thus I think we should stick with the existing solution here.
I agree. Besides, "project" is less precise than "suite". Projects make suites. They can also make multiple suites. The project == suite equivalance doesn't hold universally even though it is often the case that single project can be responsible for a single suite. Furthermore, projects can make things other than suites (single packages, or entire OS distributions). As for dak's use of "suite" to mean "testing", "stable", etc. I don't see the clash. People don't get confused that there's a tuxpaint project, a GNOME project and a Debian project. Neither should they be confused that tuxpaint is in the Debian Jr. suite, which is looked after by the Debian Jr. project, and which is also a part of the Debian "testing" suite. Ben Armstrong _______________________________________________ Debtags-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debtags-devel
