Peter Rockai wrote: > To pick an example under role::sw:amusement. There, the hierarchy is > software->amusement, but the properties of being software and being amusing > are orthogonal. There can be an amusing piece of text (fortune data packages > come to mind). The "amusement" bit probably belongs under use:: (purpose).
There's an awful lot of debate in the list archives about where the dividing lines between role::sw categories should go, so summarising the reasoning behind them would be tricky. Looking back, I see I was at one point arguing against creating (its precursor) role::sw:game and in favour of merging role::sw:* into one tag, so maybe I should just leave you to it. -- JBR Ankh kak! (Ancient Egyptian blessing) _______________________________________________ Debtags-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debtags-devel
