Benjamin Mesing wrote: >> I maintain a couple of packages that produce -dbg binary packages >> (stripped debugging symbols only, in case anyone is unfamiliar with >> them). I notice that right now there is no role:: or devel:: tag for >> these sorts of packages, so I have temproarily tagged both as todo.
The "role:: questions" thread was here: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debtags-devel/2006-December/001529.htm > Regarding a role:: tag, I believe the most appropriate one is > currently ::devel-lib. Do we need another tag here? Surely they're variants of ordinary runtime-dependency (ie role::shared-lib) library packages? That's certainly what the long description of (eg) apache-dbg seems to say: bugreport submitters who want to add extra debugging data are told to install a -dbg library and then rerun the application, not rebuild it. -- JBR Ankh kak! (Ancient Egyptian blessing) _______________________________________________ Debtags-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debtags-devel
