Le Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 10:02:08AM -0800, Shaun Jackman a écrit : > 2008/11/17 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Also, since we have biology::format:fasta, why are you suggesting > > works-with-format::fasta and works-with-format::fastq instead of just > > biology::format:fastq? > > I noticed biology::format:fasta only after I suggested > works-with-format::fasta. I'm now asking what the difference between > the two would be. The two categories biology::format and > works-with-format seem redundant.
Hi Shaun, the biology:: facet was the product of a disucussion during which I had some misunderstandings about debtags. I wouldn't mind to see it removed. Here is the lastest wishlist I made to the Debtags team: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debtags-devel/2008-September/001841.html I would of course welcome the creation of a works-with-format:: tags for the bioinformatics programs we package. Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan _______________________________________________ Debtags-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debtags-devel
