On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> - To componentize Debian Jr. so that people can pick and choose only
> those parts of it that are relevant to them. It would augment our more
> rigid, coarser categorization in our metapackages and may even be good
> enough to either simplify it (reducing it to, say, three or four basic
> groupings rather than the ~20 we have now).
Sounds like a reasonable strategy. The reasonable number of
components might differ from Blend to Blend.
> - To expand on our core with some recommendations of software that Jr.
> users might find interesting outside of the core. Strict control over
> the workflow isn't needed, and indeed isn't even desirable to
> accomplish this.
What do you have in mind by "strict" control?
> It would allow us to update our recommendations after
> the release has gone out without having to upload new metapackages and
> may be a more democratic process for making such recommendations.
I fail to see what you mean with democratic. Could you try to
explain in more technical terms?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
_______________________________________________
Debtags-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debtags-devel
