> > I'd say that x11::xserver is a package providing an X server, that is, > > something that X clients can connect to. I guess that covers whatever > > gives us /usr/bin/X, xnest, xephyr and probably not many others. > > Which would fail our minimum package count requirement for a tag. > However, for completeness of the facet I would vote to leave it there. > > Or we could change the (short) description to "X Server and Drivers". In > fact I would be in favour of this solution.
If there are no objections in the next couple of days, I am going to modify the vocabulary accordingly (i.e. x11::xserver gets the short description "X Server and Drivers", long description "X servers and drivers for the X server (input and video)") and perform the neccessary tagging to reach a consistent state. Best regards Ben _______________________________________________ Debtags-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debtags-devel
