The MIME/SMTP architects must have envisioned some use for two different names or there would be no reason to specify it twice. Does one take precedents over the other?
The short answer is that this is a known vulnerability, so it must be caught. :)
The slightly longer answer is that there is no known reason to specify the filename twice in two separate formats, and the RFCs do not specify which should be used.
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver vulnerability detection.
Find out what you have been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.
--- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
--- This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.Virus". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
