"Ever" is a long time. Yes, there have been a few problems. (But there are a couple of false positives in the regular dats each year)
By Beta they reflect the fact that they have not had (taken) the time to run the Full regression test suite.
Overall the quality is only a slight bit less than than the regular DATs.


I use them when I need coverage before the regular DATs or an Extra.dat is available.

Greg Little


serge wrote:


Are DailyDats always at least as recent as sdat/xdat ?
DailyDats are supposed to be beta quality. Anyone ever had a problem with
these ?




---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Findlay Internet]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.Virus".    The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Reply via email to