|
Hi
Matt:
>> if it will
still reject E-mail addressed locally (IMail does not for instance). I
think that this might be appropriate as long as the server doesn't have roaming
users that connect with SMTP AUTH <<
If
it's IIS then it will NOT care what (forged) email addresses may appear in the
headers.
It
will simply drop after the EHLO if the connection came from outside the
permitted IP range.
IIS
does have a setting that WILL permit SMTP AUTH users to send email no matter
WHICH IP they are sending from (that's why it waits for the
EHLO).
SMTP
AUTH is your friend (however, there are known
cases, where hackers have tried a few common standard password combinations in
order to use SMTP AUTH - so common sense password standards still
apply!)
>> the customer's
server has become standard practice as a result
<<
Of
course! It is the only prudent configuration if you are gatewaying for someone.
There are plenty port 25 scanners running all the time to find open relays, or
to find non-MXed mail servers.
Best
Regards
Andy Schmidt H&M Systems Software, Inc. 600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203 Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846 Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax: +1 201 934-9206 http://www.HM-Software.com/
|
Title: Message
- RE: [Declude.Virus] Virus bypassing newer MX records Goran Jovanovic
- RE: [Declude.Virus] Virus bypassing newer MX reco... Andy Schmidt
- RE: [Declude.Virus] Virus bypassing newer MX reco... Andy Schmidt
- Re: [Declude.Virus] Virus bypassing newer MX reco... Russ Uhte \(Lists\)
- Re: [Declude.Virus] Virus bypassing newer MX ... Bill Landry
- Re: [Declude.Virus] Virus bypassing newer... Russ Uhte \(Lists\)
- Re: [Declude.Virus] Virus bypassing newer... Greg Little
