Re: [Declude.Virus] Feature request

[Greg Little]

Sounds practical. We've been NEEDing that enhancement for a while. We do mail (and web sites) for 100 local businesses and so I have to be VERY careful not to offend clients by over blocking. The current, just use one list for both areas, means that my zips currently don't get ANY help from extension blocking. Greg Little PS  To Pete, who was looking to count the depth of zip inside zip for a trigger. I don't think Declude can see that far down without the "cost" of fully unpacking each layer of the zip. So I would not expect to get that one. It would be a nice backup for AV programs that only dig a few layers down. But if  viruses start running 5 or more layers down, the AV companies will just update their engines to look deeper. An XP pc can look down through the layers of a zip, like it was just subdirectories, so perhaps someday it will get used to sneak things in. serge wrote: the issue will be resolved when the granularity is added to banzipext which scott said they should introduce in a future release. we will have something like banzipext SCR banzipext ZIP No ? --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Findlay Internet] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.Virus". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.