Wolf, I use McAfee, CLAM, Internal AVG, and at one time (before licensing changes) F-Prot all at the same time. If you have extra CPU there is no reason not to use multiple scanners. One thing though when I switched to processing AV last I seen a dramatic drop in viruses due to them being caught as spam. 50-60K a month down to less than 2K. FWIW - I have McAfee as my last scanner and every now and than I see it grab a few viruses that the others miss.
Darrell ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. ----- Original Message ----- From: Wolf Tombe To: declude.virus@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 10:16 AM Subject: [Declude.Virus] Clam AV vs. AVG vs. McAfee The discussion on the current version of Clam AV and Clam being able to detect some image spam got me thinking. Prior to Declude version 4.0, I always used McAfee AV to scan all incoming messages. When I upgraded to Declude 4 I decided to try it's built in AV which seems to work fine. I'm curious though as to the opinions of others on this list as to the merits of using Clam or other anti-virus scanners either in place of the Declude built in AV or in addition to it. Any opinions people would like to share will be appreciated. Thanks! Wolf --- This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.Virus". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.Virus". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
