On 15 jul 2011, at 19.21em, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: > On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[email protected]> > wrote: >> - should it be Confluence backed, or whatever the ASF is now using (don't >> remember exactly what it is, Niklas ?) > > For podlings, I don't think Confluence is allowed for sites. First > choice should probably be the CMS, but if the project wants, it could > look into other offline site generators and then use SVN pubsub to > publish the site. I know some projects use Scalate. But, the CMS is > probably the easiest way forward.
Sounds great. Anyone up for this? > >> 3) IP cleareance >> I think it should be quite fast. The first step would be to clearly list the >> initial committers, and to identify those who contributed to each part of >> the code, getting an ICLA for them > > Agreed, could someone do an analysis of this? Did you get external > contributions to Deft before moving the Apache? Are these covered by > any CLA or similar? They are not covered by CLA (or similar). I'll make an attempt to contact the external contributors and ask them to sign an ICLA. > >> - listing the dependencies, and their license > > Done in the proposal. > > Before moving out of the sandbox, the above and the Software grant > should be complete. The software grant is signed (by me), but not sent yet. (will not be sent until the end of next week. (vacation)) > > In addition, we should transfer the domain to ASF. Please add an INFRA > JIRA for this. > > /niklas
