[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DEFT-142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13076154#comment-13076154
]
Johnathan Meehan edited comment on DEFT-142 at 8/2/11 12:17 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------
I have just tried and am having the same trouble. I'll create another patch
this evening after work with everything merged, and we'll see. Iif anybody
wants to spend their time instead looking at DEFT-100... :)
was (Author: jmeehan):
I have just tried and am having the same trouble. I'll create another patch
this evening after work, but if anybody wants to spend their time instead
looking at DEFT-100... :)
> Dynamic creation of RequestHandlers
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: DEFT-142
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DEFT-142
> Project: Deft
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Core
> Assignee: Johnathan Meehan
> Fix For: 0.4.0
>
> Attachments: deft-142_clone.patch
>
>
> The outcome after a discussion with github.com/inferno-:
> (In the current design) it's volatile to have fields in user defined
> RequestHandlers in conjunction with asynchronous calls. (intermediate request
> (to same RH) could change the state of the RH)
> We should investigate the performance impact for dynamic creation of RH.
> Proposed solution:
> 1, Map<String, RequestHandler> => Map<String, Class<RequestHandler>>
> 2, Application.getHandler should create the appropriate RequestHandler using
> reflection.
> 3, UT / benchmark
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
