Behan Webster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: |> aph has suggested changing 'Inst-Version' to read 'New-Version' which |> seems to fit better.. | |The problem is that it isn't necessarily a "new version". It could be |an old version. The "Inst-version" is supposed to go along with the |"Inst" radio or check box (the problem beingthat instead of Inst, it is |labeled "I"). | |"New-Version" was what I originally called it, until I found that it |confused people in my informal testing group (because it isn't always a |"new version").
What about "archive version" or "offered version"? Cheers, --Amos --Amos Shapira | "Of course Australia was marked for 133 Shlomo Ben-Yosef st. | glory, for its people had been chosen Jerusalem 93 805 | by the finest judges in England." ISRAEL [EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Anonymous -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
