Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > #1 I can't seem to find out who compiled apt for m68k,
<URL:http://www.nl.debian.org/Lists-Archives/debian-devel-changes-9805/msg00091.html> The fact that there is no indication of who compiled a binary-only upload is a known deficiency of the packaging format; see the "Builder" thread on debian-policy for possible fixes. > they obviously didn't test it in the slightest bit There are almost 2000 packages in Debian, the pitiful amount of m68k builders can not possibly test every single package, although I try to test packages which are new to the architecture, we are going to miss some. > #2 Your bug output shows that is is a version eariler than .6 - it links > against slang and other packages that .8 does not, bu the version > says .8! How can this be? Read the bug report, he ran `bug' on an i386 machine, not an m68k one. > When porting this thing, please do test it alot, it is important! As far as I'm concerned, Deity is way less important than any of the 1000+ packages in hamm/main, simply because they aren't in experimental. YMMV -- James -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
